If you wish to contribute or participate in the discussions about articles you are invited to contact the Editor

Relativistic Path Range Effect: Difference between revisions

From Navipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 34: Line 34:
==References==
==References==
[Ashby, N., 2003] Ashby, N., 2003. Relativity in the Global Positioning System. http://relativity.livingreviews.org/articles/lrr-2003-1/.
[Ashby, N., 2003] Ashby, N., 2003. Relativity in the Global Positioning System. http://relativity.livingreviews.org/articles/lrr-2003-1/.
[[Category:Fundamentals]]

Revision as of 10:25, 26 July 2011


FundamentalsFundamentals
Title Relativistic Path Range Effect
Author(s) J. Sanz Subirana, JM. Juan Zornoza and M. Hernandez-Pajares, University of Catalunia, Spain.
Level Advanced
Year of Publication 2011
Logo gAGE.png


This is a secondary relativistic effect that can be required only for high accuracy positioning. Its net effect on range is less than 2 cm and thence, for most purposes it can be neglected.


This effect is named the Shapiro signal propagation delay and introduces a general relativistic correction to the geometric range: Due to the space-time curvature produced by the gravitational field, the Euclidean range computed by carrier phase measurement must be corrected by an amount given by the expression:

[math]\displaystyle{ \rho_{_{rel}}=\frac{2\,\mu}{c^2}ln\frac{r^{sat}+r_{rcv}+r_{rcv}^{sat}}{r^{sat}+r_{rcv}-r_{rcv}^{sat}} \qquad \mbox{(1)} }[/math]


where [math]\displaystyle{ r^{sat}, r_{rcv} }[/math] are the geocentric distances of satellite and receiver and [math]\displaystyle{ r_{rcv}^{sat} }[/math] is the distance between them. The constants [math]\displaystyle{ c = 299792458 m/s }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ c=299792458\,m/s }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ \mu=G\,M_\oplus=3.986004418 \cdot 10^{14}\, m^3/s^2 }[/math] are the sped of light and the earth's gravitational constant, respectively (see GNSS Reference Frames).


This correction must be added to the Euclidian distance given by the following equation (2).

[math]\displaystyle{ \rho_{rcv}^{sat}=\left\| {r}_{rcv}-{r}^{sat}\right \|=\sqrt{(x_{rcv}-x^{sat})^2+(y_{rcv}-y^{sat})^2+(z_{rcv}-z^{sat})^2} \qquad \mbox{(2)} }[/math]


Next figure 1 illustrates with an example the Shapiro signal propagation delays for the satellites in view from a receiver in Barcelona, Spain (receiver coordinates [math]\displaystyle{ \lambda\simeq 2^ o $\phi \simeq 41^o }[/math]).

Figure 1: Shapiro correction to the geometric range for the satellites in view from a receiver at [math]\displaystyle{ \lambda\simeq 2^ o $\phi \simeq 41^o }[/math] coordinates.

A very good review of relativistic effects on GPS can be found in [Ashby, N., 2003], (see http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2003-1).


References

[Ashby, N., 2003] Ashby, N., 2003. Relativity in the Global Positioning System. http://relativity.livingreviews.org/articles/lrr-2003-1/.