If you wish to contribute or participate in the discussions about articles you are invited to contact the Editor

Main Page: Difference between revisions

From Navipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 109: Line 109:
* [[Reference 5]] [[File:ActionArrow.png|baseline|link=]]
* [[Reference 5]] [[File:ActionArrow.png|baseline|link=]]
|}
|}
{|
{|style="width:99%" border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="2" align="center"
|align=right|[[File:Galileo Brochure Cover.png|100px|link=]]
|align=right|[[File:Galileo Brochure Cover.png|100px|link=]]
|align=right|[[File:UN GNSS Book Cover.png|100px|link=]]
|align=right|[[File:UN GNSS Book Cover.png|100px|link=]]

Revision as of 12:40, 10 October 2011

QuoteOpen.png The reference for Global Navigation Satellite Systems.QuoteClose.png


Browse Articles by Category
Global-Navigation-Satellite-Systems.png
GALILEO GPS GLONASS COMPASS
Satellite-Based-Augmentation-Systems.png
EGNOS WAAS MSAS Other SBAS
Regional-Navigation-Satellite-Systems.png
IRNSS QZSS Other Regional Systems
Fundamentals-Receivers-and-Applications.png
Fundamentals Receivers Applications
Highlights
The Stanford – ESA Integrity Diagram: Focusing on SBAS Integrity

posted 16 August 2010 | in Category:EGNOS

In this article, a new concept for SBAS integrity validation is presented. The proposed concept is a modification of the well known Stanford diagram, where a 2D histogram shows the relationship of position errors against protection levels for a set of measurements using an all in view satellite selection. The new method consists on two diagrams: the Worst-Safety Index diagram and the “All-Geometries” diagram, known here as the Stanford-ESA and the All-Stanford-ESA, respectively. Read more...ActionArrow.png

Follow us on...
Newsletter Facebook LinkedIN RSS Feed Twitter
Quick References
Galileo Brochure Cover.png UN GNSS Book Cover.png