If you wish to contribute or participate in the discussions about articles you are invited to contact the Editor

Main Page: Difference between revisions

From Navipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
<div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:x-large; font-weight:normal;">[[File:quoteOpen.png|super]] The reference for Global Navigation Satellite Services.[[File:quoteClose.png|super]]</span></div>
<div style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size:x-large; font-weight:normal;">[[File:quoteOpen.png|super|link=]] The reference for Global Navigation Satellite Services.[[File:quoteClose.png|super|link=]]</span></div>




Line 70: Line 70:
| <span style="font-size:medium; font-weight:bold;">Quick References</span>
| <span style="font-size:medium; font-weight:bold;">Quick References</span>
|}
|}
* Reference 1 [[File:ActionArrow.png]]
* Reference 1 [[File:ActionArrow.png|top|link=]]
* Reference 2
* Reference 2
* Reference 3
* Reference 3

Revision as of 16:48, 26 December 2010

QuoteOpen.png The reference for Global Navigation Satellite Services.QuoteClose.png


Browse Articles by Category
GALILEO EGNOS
GPS GLONASS
Fundamentals Systems Receivers Applications
Highlights
The Stanford – ESA Integrity Diagram: Focusing on SBAS Integrity

posted 16 August 2010 | in Category:EGNOS

In this article, a new concept for SBAS integrity validation is presented. The proposed concept is a modification of the well known Stanford diagram, where a 2D histogram shows the relationship of position errors against protection levels for a set of measurements using an all in view satellite selection. The new method consists on two diagrams: the Worst-Safety Index diagram and the “All-Geometries” diagram, known here as the Stanford-ESA and the All-Stanford-ESA, respectively. more...

Follow us on...
Follow-Sprite.png
Quick References
  • Reference 1 ActionArrow.png
  • Reference 2
  • Reference 3
  • Reference 4
  • Reference 5