If you wish to contribute or participate in the discussions about articles you are invited to contact the Editor

Main Page: Difference between revisions

From Navipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
{| style="width:100%" border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="2" align="center"
{| style="width:100%" border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="2" align="center"
|-
|-
| style="width:60%; border:1px solid #444; align:center; vertical-align:top" |
| style="width:60%; border:1px solid #cec; align:center; vertical-align:top" |
<!-- left column -->
<!-- left column -->
{|style= "width:100%" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="2"
{|style= "width:100%" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="2"

Revision as of 14:41, 26 December 2010

The World's reference for Global Navigation Satellite Services knowledge


Popular pages – Articles alphabetically – Search
Browse Articles by Category
GALILEO EGNOS
GPS GLONASS
Fundamentals Systems Receivers Applications
Highlights
The Stanford – ESA Integrity Diagram: Focusing on SBAS Integrity

posted 16 August 2010 | in Category:EGNOS

In this article, a new concept for SBAS integrity validation is presented. The proposed concept is a modification of the well known Stanford diagram, where a 2D histogram shows the relationship of position errors against protection levels for a set of measurements using an all in view satellite selection. The new method consists on two diagrams: the Worst-Safety Index diagram and the “All-Geometries” diagram, known here as the Stanford-ESA and the All-Stanford-ESA, respectively. more...

Follow us on..
Follow-Sprite.png
Quick References
  • Reference 1
  • Reference 2
  • Reference 3
  • Reference 4
  • Reference 5