If you wish to contribute or participate in the discussions about articles you are invited to contact the Editor

Main Page: Difference between revisions

From Navipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 22: Line 22:
|-
|-
|colspan=4 align=center|[[File:Global-Navigation-Space-Sys.png|link= ]]
|colspan=4 align=center|[[File:Global-Navigation-Space-Sys.png|link= ]]
<!--
{|style="width:99%; border:2px solid #d5d6d2; border-top:none; border-left:none; border-right:none;" border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="2" align="center"  
{|style="width:99%; border:2px solid #d5d6d2; border-top:none; border-left:none; border-right:none;" border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="2" align="center"  
|}
|}
-->
|-
|-
|align=center|[[File:EGNOS.png|100px|link=:Category:EGNOS|EGNOS]]
|align=center|[[File:EGNOS.png|100px|link=:Category:EGNOS|EGNOS]]

Revision as of 20:42, 21 February 2011

QuoteOpen.png The reference for Global Navigation Satellite Systems.QuoteClose.png


Browse Articles by Category
GALILEO GPS GLONASS COMPASS
Global-Navigation-Space-Sys.png
EGNOS WAAS MSAS Other SBAS
IRNSS QZSS Other Regional Systems
Fundamentals Receivers Applications
Highlights
The Stanford – ESA Integrity Diagram: Focusing on SBAS Integrity

posted 16 August 2010 | in Category:EGNOS

In this article, a new concept for SBAS integrity validation is presented. The proposed concept is a modification of the well known Stanford diagram, where a 2D histogram shows the relationship of position errors against protection levels for a set of measurements using an all in view satellite selection. The new method consists on two diagrams: the Worst-Safety Index diagram and the “All-Geometries” diagram, known here as the Stanford-ESA and the All-Stanford-ESA, respectively. Read more...ActionArrow.png

Follow us on...
Follow-Sprite.png
Quick References