If you wish to contribute or participate in the discussions about articles you are invited to contact the Editor

Main Page: Difference between revisions

From Navipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:
|align=center|[[File:GALILEO.png|100px|link=:Category:GALILEO|GALILEO]]
|align=center|[[File:GALILEO.png|100px|link=:Category:GALILEO|GALILEO]]
|align=center|[[File:GPS.png|100px|link=:Category:GPS|GPS]]
|align=center|[[File:GPS.png|100px|link=:Category:GPS|GPS]]
|align=center|[[File:EGNOS.png|100px|link=:Category:EGNOS|EGNOS]]
|align=center|[[File:GLONASS.png|100px|link=:Category:GLONASS|GLONASS]]
|align=center|[[File:COMPASS.png|100px|link=:Category:COMPASS|COMPASS]]
|align=center|[[File:COMPASS.png|100px|link=:Category:COMPASS|COMPASS]]
|-
|-

Revision as of 21:42, 20 February 2011

QuoteOpen.png The reference for Global Navigation Satellite Systems.QuoteClose.png


Browse Articles by Category
GALILEO GPS GLONASS COMPASS
align=center|IRNSS align=center|QZSS align=center|Other Regional Systems
EGNOS WAAS MBAS Other SBAS
Fundamentals Receivers Applications
Highlights
The Stanford – ESA Integrity Diagram: Focusing on SBAS Integrity

posted 16 August 2010 | in Category:EGNOS

In this article, a new concept for SBAS integrity validation is presented. The proposed concept is a modification of the well known Stanford diagram, where a 2D histogram shows the relationship of position errors against protection levels for a set of measurements using an all in view satellite selection. The new method consists on two diagrams: the Worst-Safety Index diagram and the “All-Geometries” diagram, known here as the Stanford-ESA and the All-Stanford-ESA, respectively. Read more...ActionArrow.png

Follow us on...
Follow-Sprite.png
Quick References