If you wish to contribute or participate in the discussions about articles you are invited to contact the Editor
GPS Performances
| GPS | |
|---|---|
| Title | GPS Performances |
| Edited by | GMV |
| Level | Basic |
| Year of Publication | 2011 |
The US Global Positioning System (GPS) provides 24/7 positioning and timing services for worldwide users.
GPS supplies two different service levels, Standard Positioning Service and the Precise Positioning Service:
- The Standard Positioning Service (SPS),[1] is a positioning and timing service provided on GPS L1 frequency and available to all GPS users. The L1 frequency contains a coarse acquisition (C/A) code and a navigation data message.
- The Precise Positioning Service (PPS),[2] is a highly accurate military positioning, velocity and timing service broadcasted at the GPS L1 and L2 frequencies. Both frequencies contain a precision (P/Y) code ranging signal with an encrypted navigation data message that is reserved for authorized users.
Introduction
The levels of performance that the user can expect from GPS are specified in the Standard Positioning Service Performance Standard,[1] and the Precise Positioning Service Standard.[2] However, the values provided by these documents are very conservative, being the actual performances usually better than these official values.
Moreover, the performance obtained with GPS depends strongly on the mode of operation. For instance, a stand-alone receiver that uses only the signals received from the satellites, the levels of performance are:[3]
- C/A-code receivers ~ 5 -10 m.
- P/Y-code receivers ~ 2 -9 m
In case of using GPS in a differential mode, DGPS, the performances that can be expected are:
- C/A-code DGPS receivers ~0.7 -3 m.
- P/Y-code DGPS receivers ~0.5 -2.0 m.
More advanced techniques, such as Real Time Kinematics or Precise Point Positioning, might provide performances in the order of a few centimeters.
GPS Service Level Performances
The Performances of each Service are different and they are specified in the Standard Positioning Service Performance Standard, and the Precise Positioning Standard.
Standard Positioning Service (SPS) Performances
The Performance standards for SPS Service based on Single Frequency C/A-Code are:[1]
| GPS Performance Standard Metric | SPS User Performance | SPS Signal in Space Performance | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Accuracy | All-in-View Horizontal 95% | <100 m | < 9 m |
| All-in-View Vertical 95% | <156 m | < 15 m | |
| Worst Site Accuracy | All-in-View Horizontal 95% | <100 m | < 17 m |
| All-in-View Vertical 95% | <156 m | < 37 m | |
| User Range Error (URE) | N/A | <7.8 m 95% of time | |
| Time Transfer Accuracy | N/A | <40 ns 95% of time | |
| Geometry (PDOP ≤ 6) | > 95.86% global | > 98% global | |
| > 83.9% worst site | > 88% worst site | ||
| Constellation Availability | N/A | >98% Probability of 21 Healthy Satellites | |
Precise Positioning Service (PPS) Performances
The Performance standards for PPS Service based on Dual Frequency P/Y-Code are:[2]
| GPS Performance Standard Metric | SPS User Performance | SPS Signal in Space Performance | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global Accuracy | All-in-View Horizontal 95% | < 36 m | < 13 m |
| All-in-View Vertical 95% | < 77 m | < 22 m | |
| User Range Error (URE) | N/A | <5.9 m 95% of time | |
| Time Transfer Accuracy | N/A | <40 ns 95% of time | |
| Integrity | N/A | < 1x10-5 Probability Over Any Hour | |
| Geometry (PDOP ≤ 6) | >95.7% global | >98% global | |
| Constellation Availability | N/A | >98% Probability of 21 Healthy Satellites | |
In general, PPS performance standards are in line with SPS ones. Some advantages of PPS Service opposite to the SPS Service are that PPS access to WAGE (Wide Area GPS Enhancements) rapid ephemeris updates and corrections, and the use of dual frequency to correct the delay suffered by the signal in its transmission through the ionosphere in real time, which implies a significant performance improvement. The P/Y code is encrypted to avoid spoofing and the access to the service to unauthorised users.
Modernized Signals Performances
Since the beginning of the transmission of the CNAV navigation message, by April 2014, the L2C signal is suffering several improvements. On March 2015 the U.S. Air Force reported that signal performance of CNAV matches or slightly outperforms Legacy performance: average user range error (RMS URE) from 25 February – 3 March 2015 was 0.50 m for Legacy and 0.57 m for Modernized; best week for Modernized signals since the broadcast initiated April 2014 was 0.42 m for 6 – 13 January 2015[4].
Combined Services Performances
GPS can be interoperable with other GNSS systems. When combining GPS with other GNSS constellations this enhances positioning performance. This is due to an improvement in availability, i.e. the number of satellites in view is larger, and geometry.
There are other ways to enhance the GPS positioning solution, such as GNSS Augmentation systems, or Differential GNSS techniques, that are explained in more detail in the corresponding articles. With DGNSS the accuracy is improved to the order of 1 m, and the GNSS Augmentation systems assure integrity.
References
- ^ a b c Global Positioning System Standard Positioning Service Performance Standard
- ^ a b c Global Positioning System Precise Positioning Service Performance Standard
- ^ The Modernization of GPS: Plans, New Capabilities and the Future Relationship to Galileo, Keith D. McDonald
- ^ CNAV Performance ‘Matches or Slightly Outperforms’ Legacy Signals, GPS World, March 19, 2015