If you wish to contribute or participate in the discussions about articles you are invited to contact the Editor

Carrier-smoothing of code pseudoranges: Difference between revisions

From Navipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
|Title={{PAGENAME}}
|Title={{PAGENAME}}
|Authors= J. Sanz Subirana, JM. Juan Zornoza and M. Hernandez-Pajares, University of Catalunia, Spain.
|Authors= J. Sanz Subirana, JM. Juan Zornoza and M. Hernandez-Pajares, University of Catalunia, Spain.
|Level=Medium
|Level=Advanced
|YearOfPublication=2011
|YearOfPublication=2011
|Logo=gAGE
|Logo=gAGE

Revision as of 15:45, 27 October 2011


FundamentalsFundamentals
Title Carrier-smoothing of code pseudoranges
Author(s) J. Sanz Subirana, JM. Juan Zornoza and M. Hernandez-Pajares, University of Catalunia, Spain.
Level Advanced
Year of Publication 2011
Logo gAGE.png


The noisy (but unambiguous) code pseudorange measurements can be smoothed with the precise (but ambiguous) carrier phase measurements. A simple algorithm (the Hatch filter) is given as follows:

Let's [math]\displaystyle{ R(s;n) }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ \Phi(s;n) }[/math] the code and carrier measurement of a given satellite [math]\displaystyle{ s }[/math] at the time [math]\displaystyle{ n }[/math]. Thence, the smoothed code [math]\displaystyle{ \hat{R}(s;n) }[/math] can be computed as:

[math]\displaystyle{ \widehat{R}(s;k)= \frac{1}{n} R(s;k)+ \frac{n-1}{n} \left [\widehat{R}(s;k-1)+ \left( \Phi(s;k)-\Phi(s;k-1) \right) \right ] \qquad \mbox{(1)} }[/math]
The algorithm is initialised with:
[math]\displaystyle{ \widehat{R}(s;1)= R(s;1) }[/math]


where, [math]\displaystyle{ n=k }[/math] when [math]\displaystyle{ k\lt N }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ n=N }[/math] when [math]\displaystyle{ k \geq N }[/math].\\[0.2cm] This algorithm must be initialised every time that a carrier phase cycle-slip occurs.

The previous algorithm can be interpreted as a real-time alignment of the carrier phase to the code measurement. That is:

[math]\displaystyle{ \begin{array}{ll} \widehat{R}_k&=\Phi_k + \left ( R - \Phi \right )_k=\\[0.3cm] & =\Phi_k + \frac{n-1}{n} \left( R - \Phi \right )_{k-1} + \frac{1}{n} \left ( R_k - \Phi_k \right )=\\[0.3cm] &= \Phi_k +\frac{n-1}{n} \left (\widehat{R}_{k-1}-\Phi_{k-1} \right )+ \frac{1}{n} \left( R_k-\Phi_k \right)=\\[0.3cm] &= \frac{1}{n} R_k+ \frac{n-1}{n} \left [\widehat{R}_{k-1}+ \left( \Phi_k-\Phi_{k-1} \right) \right ]\\ \end{array} \qquad \mbox{(2)} }[/math]


where the mean bias [footnotes 1] [math]\displaystyle{ \left ( R - \Phi \right ) }[/math] between the code and carrier phase is estimated in real time and used to align the carrier phase with the code.

For more information, please go to the article:


Notes

  1. ^ The mean value of a set of measurements \{[math]\displaystyle{ x_1,\cdots,x_n\} }[/math] can be computed recursively as: [math]\displaystyle{ \lt x\gt _k= \frac{1}{k} x_k+ \frac{k-1}{k}\lt x\gt _{k-1} }[/math]. The equation (2) is a variant of previous expression, that provides an estimate of a moving average over a [math]\displaystyle{ N }[/math] samples window. Notice that, when [math]\displaystyle{ k \geq N }[/math], the weighting factors [math]\displaystyle{ \frac{1}{N} }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ \frac{N-1}{N} }[/math] are used instead of [math]\displaystyle{ \frac{1}{k} }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ \frac{k-1}{k} }[/math].