If you wish to contribute or participate in the discussions about articles you are invited to contact the Editor
Main Page: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
In this article, a new concept for SBAS integrity validation is presented. The proposed concept is a modification of the well known Stanford diagram, where a 2D histogram shows the relationship of position errors against protection levels for a set of measurements using an all in view satellite selection. The new method consists on two diagrams: the Worst-Safety Index diagram and the “All-Geometries” diagram, known here as the Stanford-ESA and the All-Stanford-ESA, respectively. [[The Stanford – ESA Integrity Diagram: Focusing on SBAS Integrity|''more...'']] | In this article, a new concept for SBAS integrity validation is presented. The proposed concept is a modification of the well known Stanford diagram, where a 2D histogram shows the relationship of position errors against protection levels for a set of measurements using an all in view satellite selection. The new method consists on two diagrams: the Worst-Safety Index diagram and the “All-Geometries” diagram, known here as the Stanford-ESA and the All-Stanford-ESA, respectively. [[The Stanford – ESA Integrity Diagram: Focusing on SBAS Integrity|''more...'']] | ||
|} | |||
|- | |||
{| style="width:99%; font-weight:bold; border:3px solid #aaa; border-top:none; border-left:none; border-right:none;" border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="2" align="center" | |||
|- | |||
| <span style="font-size:medium; font-weight:bold;">Quick References</span> | |||
|} | |||
[[File:Follow-Sprite.png]] | |||
|} | |} | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 59: | Line 66: | ||
* Reference 5 | * Reference 5 | ||
|} | |} | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 13:49, 26 December 2010
|
|
|
| Quick References |
- Reference 1
- Reference 2
- Reference 3
- Reference 4
- Reference 5
|}