If you wish to contribute or participate in the discussions about articles you are invited to contact the Editor
Main Page: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
<sup>posted 16 August 2010 | in [[:Category:EGNOS]]</sup> | <sup>posted 16 August 2010 | in [[:Category:EGNOS]]</sup> | ||
In this article, a new concept for SBAS integrity validation is presented. The proposed concept is a modification of the well known Stanford diagram, where a 2D histogram shows the relationship of position errors against protection levels for a set of measurements using an all in view satellite selection. The new method consists on two diagrams: the Worst-Safety Index diagram and the “All-Geometries” diagram, known here as the Stanford-ESA and the All-Stanford-ESA, respectively. |'' | In this article, a new concept for SBAS integrity validation is presented. The proposed concept is a modification of the well known Stanford diagram, where a 2D histogram shows the relationship of position errors against protection levels for a set of measurements using an all in view satellite selection. The new method consists on two diagrams: the Worst-Safety Index diagram and the “All-Geometries” diagram, known here as the Stanford-ESA and the All-Stanford-ESA, respectively. [[The Stanford – ESA Integrity Diagram: Focusing on SBAS Integrity|''more...'']] | ||
|} | |} | ||
|- | |- | ||
Revision as of 11:04, 26 December 2010
|
|
|
