If you wish to contribute or participate in the discussions about articles you are invited to contact the Editor

Main Page: Difference between revisions

From Navipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 70: Line 70:
{| style="width:99%; border:0px solid #8b8d8e;" border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="2" align="center"
{| style="width:99%; border:0px solid #8b8d8e;" border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="2" align="center"
|-
|-
| <span style="font-weight:bold;">The Stanford – ESA Integrity Diagram: Focusing on SBAS Integrity</span>
| <rss title=off>http://www.esa.int/rss/NAV.xml</rss>
<sup>posted 16 August 2010 | in [[:Category:EGNOS]]</sup>
 
In this article, a new concept for SBAS integrity validation is presented. The proposed concept is a modification of the well known Stanford diagram, where a 2D histogram shows the relationship of position errors against protection levels for a set of measurements using an all in view satellite selection. The new method consists on two diagrams: the Worst-Safety Index diagram and the “All-Geometries” diagram, known here as the Stanford-ESA and the All-Stanford-ESA, respectively. [[The Stanford – ESA Integrity Diagram: Focusing on SBAS Integrity|''Read more...'']][[File:ActionArrow.png|baseline|link=]]
|}
|}
<!--right column top box end-->
<!--right column top box end-->

Revision as of 15:11, 30 November 2011

The reference for Global Navigation Satellite Systems.


Browse Articles by Category
GALILEO GPS GLONASS COMPASS
EGNOS WAAS MSAS Other SBAS
IRNSS QZSS Other Regional Systems
Fundamentals Receivers Applications
Highlights
<rss title=off>http://www.esa.int/rss/NAV.xml</rss>
Follow us on...
Newsletter Facebook LinkedIN RSS Feed Twitter
Quick References
GALILEO Brochure (ESA) Current and Planned Global and Regional Navigation Systems (UNOOSA-ICG)