If you wish to contribute or participate in the discussions about articles you are invited to contact the Editor

Main Page: Difference between revisions

From Navipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 48: Line 48:
<!--right column top box end-->
<!--right column top box end-->


<!--right column top box-->
<!--right column middle box-->
{|
{|
<!--right column top box header-->
<!--right column middle box header-->
{| style="width:99%; font-weight:bold; border:3px solid #aaa; border-top:none; border-left:none; border-right:none;" border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="2" align="center"
{| style="width:99%; font-weight:bold; border:3px solid #aaa; border-top:none; border-left:none; border-right:none;" border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="2" align="center"
|-
|-
| <span style="font-size:medium; font-weight:bold;">Highlights</span>
| <span style="font-size:medium; font-weight:bold;">Follow us on..</span>
|}
|}
<!--right column top box contents-->
<!--right column middle box contents-->
{| style="width:99%; border:0px solid #aaa;" border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="2" align="center"
{| style="width:99%; border:0px solid #aaa;" border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="2" align="center"
|-
|-
| <span style="font-weight:bold;">The Stanford – ESA Integrity Diagram: Focusing on SBAS Integrity</span>
|align=center|[[File:Follow-Sprite.png]]
<sup>posted 16 August 2010 | in [[:Category:EGNOS]]</sup>
 
In this article, a new concept for SBAS integrity validation is presented. The proposed concept is a modification of the well known Stanford diagram, where a 2D histogram shows the relationship of position errors against protection levels for a set of measurements using an all in view satellite selection. The new method consists on two diagrams: the Worst-Safety Index diagram and the “All-Geometries” diagram, known here as the Stanford-ESA and the All-Stanford-ESA, respectively. [[The Stanford – ESA Integrity Diagram: Focusing on SBAS Integrity|''more...'']]
|}
<!--right column top box end-->
 
<!--right column middle box-->
{| style="width:99%; font-weight:bold; border:3px solid #aaa; border-top:none; border-left:none; border-right:none;" border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="2" align="center"
|-
<!--right column middle box header-->
| <span style="font-size:medium; font-weight:bold;">Follow us on...</span>
align=center|[[File:Follow-Sprite.png]]
|}
|}
<!--middle column top box end-->


{| style="width:99%; font-weight:bold; border:3px solid #aaa; border-top:none; border-left:none; border-right:none;" border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="2" align="center"
{| style="width:99%; font-weight:bold; border:3px solid #aaa; border-top:none; border-left:none; border-right:none;" border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="2" align="center"

Revision as of 14:31, 26 December 2010

The World's reference for Global Navigation Satellite Services knowledge


Popular pages – Articles alphabetically – Search
GALILEO EGNOS
GPS GLONASS
Fundamentals Systems Receivers Applications
Highlights
The Stanford – ESA Integrity Diagram: Focusing on SBAS Integrity

posted 16 August 2010 | in Category:EGNOS

In this article, a new concept for SBAS integrity validation is presented. The proposed concept is a modification of the well known Stanford diagram, where a 2D histogram shows the relationship of position errors against protection levels for a set of measurements using an all in view satellite selection. The new method consists on two diagrams: the Worst-Safety Index diagram and the “All-Geometries” diagram, known here as the Stanford-ESA and the All-Stanford-ESA, respectively. more...

Follow us on..
Follow-Sprite.png
Quick References
  • Reference 1
  • Reference 2
  • Reference 3
  • Reference 4
  • Reference 5
Retrieved from "https://gssc.esa.int/navipedia/index.php?title=Main_Page&oldid=380"