If you wish to contribute or participate in the discussions about articles you are invited to contact the Editor

Main Page: Difference between revisions

From Navipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
<div style="text-align: center; padding: 0.6em 0 0.6em 0; margin-bottom: 1px;">
<div style="text-align: center; padding: 0.6em 0 0.6em 0; margin-bottom: 1px;">
'''[[:Special:Popularpages|Popular pages]]&nbsp;– [[:Category:Systems|Articles alphabetically]]&nbsp;– [[Special:Search|Search]]'''</div>
'''[[:Special:Popularpages|Popular pages]]&nbsp;– [[:Category:Systems|Articles alphabetically]]&nbsp;– [[Special:Search|Search]]'''</div>
 
<!-- main page box -->
{| style="width:100%" border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="2" align="center"
{| style="width:100%" border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="2" align="center"
|-
|-
| style="width:60%; border:1px solid #aaa; align:center; vertical-align:top" |
| style="width:60%; border:1px solid #aaa; align:center; vertical-align:top" |
<!--
<!-- left column -->
{| style="width:99%; border:0px solid #aaa; " border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="2" align="center" |
|-
|style="border:1px solid #aaa; border-bottom:none" align="center"|'''Operational issues'''
|style="border:1px solid #aaa;" align="center"|Go to:<br>[[Portal:Enhancing_Safety|Enhancing Safety Portal]]
|style="border:1px solid #aaa;" align="center"|Go to:<br>[[Portal:Safety_Regulations|Safety Regulations Portal]]
|}
-->
{|style= "width:100%" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="2"
{|style= "width:100%" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="2"
|-
|-
Line 35: Line 28:
|align=center|[[File:Applications.png|100px|link=:Category:Applications|Applications]]
|align=center|[[File:Applications.png|100px|link=:Category:Applications|Applications]]
|}
|}
 
<!-- end left column -->
<!-- right column -->
| style="width:40%; border:1px solid #aaa; align:center; vertical-align:top" |
| style="width:40%; border:1px solid #aaa; align:center; vertical-align:top" |
<!--right column top box-->
{|
{|
<!--right column top box header-->
{| style="width:99%; font-weight:bold; border:3px solid #aaa; border-top:none; border-left:none; border-right:none;" border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="2" align="center"
|-
| <span style="font-size:medium; font-weight:bold;">Highlights</span>
|}
<!--right column top box contents-->
{| style="width:99%; border:0px solid #aaa;" border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="2" align="center"
|-
| <span style="font-weight:bold;">The Stanford – ESA Integrity Diagram: Focusing on SBAS Integrity</span>
<sup>posted 16 August 2010 | in [[:Category:EGNOS]]</sup>


In this article, a new concept for SBAS integrity validation is presented. The proposed concept is a modification of the well known Stanford diagram, where a 2D histogram shows the relationship of position errors against protection levels for a set of measurements using an all in view satellite selection. The new method consists on two diagrams: the Worst-Safety Index diagram and the “All-Geometries” diagram, known here as the Stanford-ESA and the All-Stanford-ESA, respectively. [[The Stanford – ESA Integrity Diagram: Focusing on SBAS Integrity|''more...'']]
|}
<!--right column top box end-->
<!--right column top box-->
{|
<!--right column top box header-->
{| style="width:99%; font-weight:bold; border:3px solid #aaa; border-top:none; border-left:none; border-right:none;" border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="2" align="center"
{| style="width:99%; font-weight:bold; border:3px solid #aaa; border-top:none; border-left:none; border-right:none;" border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="2" align="center"
|-
|-
| <span style="font-size:medium; font-weight:bold;">Highlights</span>
| <span style="font-size:medium; font-weight:bold;">Highlights</span>
|}
|}
 
<!--right column top box contents-->
{| style="width:99%; border:0px solid #aaa;" border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="2" align="center"
{| style="width:99%; border:0px solid #aaa;" border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="2" align="center"
|-
|-
Line 51: Line 63:
In this article, a new concept for SBAS integrity validation is presented. The proposed concept is a modification of the well known Stanford diagram, where a 2D histogram shows the relationship of position errors against protection levels for a set of measurements using an all in view satellite selection. The new method consists on two diagrams: the Worst-Safety Index diagram and the “All-Geometries” diagram, known here as the Stanford-ESA and the All-Stanford-ESA, respectively. [[The Stanford – ESA Integrity Diagram: Focusing on SBAS Integrity|''more...'']]
In this article, a new concept for SBAS integrity validation is presented. The proposed concept is a modification of the well known Stanford diagram, where a 2D histogram shows the relationship of position errors against protection levels for a set of measurements using an all in view satellite selection. The new method consists on two diagrams: the Worst-Safety Index diagram and the “All-Geometries” diagram, known here as the Stanford-ESA and the All-Stanford-ESA, respectively. [[The Stanford – ESA Integrity Diagram: Focusing on SBAS Integrity|''more...'']]
|}
|}
<!--right column top box end-->


<!--right column middle box-->
{| style="width:99%; font-weight:bold; border:3px solid #aaa; border-top:none; border-left:none; border-right:none;" border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="2" align="center"
{| style="width:99%; font-weight:bold; border:3px solid #aaa; border-top:none; border-left:none; border-right:none;" border="0" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="2" align="center"
|-
|-
<!--right column middle box header-->
| <span style="font-size:medium; font-weight:bold;">Follow us on...</span>
| <span style="font-size:medium; font-weight:bold;">Follow us on...</span>
align=center|[[File:Follow-Sprite.png]]
align=center|[[File:Follow-Sprite.png]]
Line 67: Line 82:
* Reference 4
* Reference 4
* Reference 5
* Reference 5
|}
|}
 
<!-- end right column -->
|}
|}
<!-- end main page box -->

Revision as of 14:23, 26 December 2010

The World's reference for Global Navigation Satellite Services knowledge


Popular pages – Articles alphabetically – Search
GALILEO EGNOS
GPS GLONASS
Fundamentals Systems Receivers Applications
Highlights
The Stanford – ESA Integrity Diagram: Focusing on SBAS Integrity

posted 16 August 2010 | in Category:EGNOS

In this article, a new concept for SBAS integrity validation is presented. The proposed concept is a modification of the well known Stanford diagram, where a 2D histogram shows the relationship of position errors against protection levels for a set of measurements using an all in view satellite selection. The new method consists on two diagrams: the Worst-Safety Index diagram and the “All-Geometries” diagram, known here as the Stanford-ESA and the All-Stanford-ESA, respectively. more...

Highlights
The Stanford – ESA Integrity Diagram: Focusing on SBAS Integrity

posted 16 August 2010 | in Category:EGNOS

In this article, a new concept for SBAS integrity validation is presented. The proposed concept is a modification of the well known Stanford diagram, where a 2D histogram shows the relationship of position errors against protection levels for a set of measurements using an all in view satellite selection. The new method consists on two diagrams: the Worst-Safety Index diagram and the “All-Geometries” diagram, known here as the Stanford-ESA and the All-Stanford-ESA, respectively. more...

Follow us on...

align=center|Follow-Sprite.png

Quick References
  • Reference 1
  • Reference 2
  • Reference 3
  • Reference 4
  • Reference 5