Receiver Characteristics

Receivers
Title	Receiver Characteristics
Author(s)	GMV
Level	Advanced
Year of Publication	2011

Receiver characteristics and design are strongly related to the application at hand. In fact, the target application requirements are actually the main driver to a given receiver architecture and design decisions and therefore the selection of an adequate receiver usually underlies a large set of trade-offs.

Environmental Constraints

The surrounding environment influences the receiver behaviour in terms of performance, some examples are:

• Multipath: GNSS signals can be affected by multipath, whenever the reflection of the SIS signal on surrounding surfaces distorts the received signal or even generates a non-line-of-sight ray. Multipath mitigation techniques may be implemented in the receiver, at the cost of increasing the processing load. Conversely, it may be beneficial to process NLOS reflected signals for improving availability while sacrificing accuracy. The trade-off “availability vs accuracy” will rely mainly on the receiver application. For non-critical road applications in urban environments, for example, availability may be more important than accuracy, since the receiver often makes use of map matching techniques to extrapolate its position and therefore tracking of NLOS may come as a design decision, despite the large errors introduced in the final solution.

• Interference: in some applications it may be possible to predict that a certain type of interference will be present in some locations. An example is the case of aeronautical applications, where it is foreseen that TACAN/ DME beacons will cause pulse interference in the L5/ E5a band. In this case, the receiver may consider including techniques of pulse interference mitigation in the front end (link to front end). Another example to be considered are the case of some military applications that use antenna arrays and beam-forming to insert nulls in the radiation diagram of the antenna in the direction of an interferer whose position is known a-priori or detected dynamically.

• Atmospheric: Atmospheric delays that affect the signal during its propagation have a significant impact on the accuracy of the receiver measurements; therefore solution accuracy is directly linked to the receiver’s ability to correct for these delays. The most significant atmospheric delays are caused by the ionosphere and the troposphere.

• Operation Conditions: Factors such as temperature, humidity, water resistance, shock and vibration ranges depend on the application. This has an influence not only on the choice of the platform (see below), but also on the casing (e.g. ruggedization, radome) and applicable standards (e.g. if subject to certification). As an example, space receivers will have to cope with huge levels of vibration (e.g. during launch) and they will be submitted to highly inauspicious environments (e.g. radiations in space).

Application Constraints

• Receiver Dynamics: receiver dynamics may affect the received signal (e.g. increasing the range of Doppler frequencies of the incoming signals). In such applications, the design of the receiver needs to cope with such requirements. As an example, a stationary receiver is expected to handle Doppler frequencies within the range of ±4 kHz, but this value is largely exceeded in GPS-guided ballistic applications. These considerations will also have an impact on the tracking loops since the integration times must take these factors into consideration.

• Military applications: legacy military applications use the GPS Precise Position Service (PPS) which implies encryption capabilities and dual frequency receivers. Furthermore, (un)intentional interference is a major concern for military applications, since the receiver will likely have to operate in an environment where jammers and spoofers are present. Interference mitigation techniques are therefore usually welcomed for these applications.

• Aeronautical applications: the main challenge in the aeronautical domain is concentrated in the landing and taking-off phases, not only due to the required accuracy but mostly because of the need for integrity, due to its being a safety critical application. Furthermore, interference in the aeronautical band is expected in most airport vicinities, e.g. DME/ TACAN pulses in the L5 band.

• Professional applications: professional applications usually have sub-metric accuracy requirements. In addition, end-users use accurate GNSS receiver solutions for a final purpose (e.g. precision agriculture and space-time metrology). Therefore these applications often require a great deal of dedicated software customisation, mostly in the application block to ensure the interface between the receiver and the final user.

Hardware Platform

From a physical point of view, several design considerations are made in terms of the hardware host platform, user interface design, storage capability, power/battery consumption, electromagnetic compatibility, or portability. Common underlying platforms for a GNSS receiver are ASIC, FPGA, DSP, CPU, hardware/software defined, or a combination of these (and other) technologies. Table 1 below shows the comparative analysis of the platform technologies.

Table 1: GNSS technology comparison, from (++) major advantage to (--) major disadvantage.

Technology	Development Costs	Performance	Power Consumption	Single Unit Costs	Flexibility
ASIC	--	++	++	++	--
FPGA	-	++	+	-	+
DSP / CPU	++	+ / ++	+ / --	+ / -	++
Hybrid FPGA / CPU	+	++	+	-	+

The receiver platform along with its hardware components will also have an impact on the accuracy of the measurements provided by the receiver. In fact, the receiver hardware is also a source of inaccuracies adding thermal noise and inter-channel biases. Furthermore, the receiver measurements are limited by the resolution of the underlying hardware platform.

Performance

As far as GNSS receiver Performance goes:

• Availability: Whenever availability is the main driver, using multi-constellations is usually a cheap solution (due to the interoperability among the different systems) and in principle it will increase the number of satellites in view in harsh environments such as urban canyons. Using aiding sensors such as inertial sensors (INS) [4] may also improve overall solution availability, since the receiver may still be able to provide a solution even if a GNSS solution is not available at that time instant.
• Continuity: whenever solution continuity is a key driver, the receiver may accommodate dedicated algorithms, e.g. guaranteeing extrapolation of the solution (even if a GNSS solution is not present) using past measurements, external sensors (e.g. INS) or even complementary technology (e.g. UMTS, WiFi).
• Integrity: although integrity is usually associated with aeronautical applications, liability-critical applications also share this need. For safety-critical applications, the receiver may cope with integrity by using SBAS and in the future Galileo. For the remaining applications where integrity may be required, the receiver may still use SBAS, but there are also alternative receiver standalone techniques that can be implemented (less stringent), such as the Isotropy-Based Protection Levels (IBPL) [IBPL].
• Accuracy: Whenever accuracy is the main driver, receivers may decide to choose from a wide range of techniques such as Differential GNSS, Precise Point Positioning (PPP) or Real Time Kinematic.

Target Applications Oriented Receivers

Table 1 presents an order of magnitude of the 3-D position/time errors achieved with different types of receivers, both for Standard Positioning Service (SPS) and Precise Positioning Service (PPS) using legacy GPS. Note that this table is valid for GPS only and it is provided here for illustrative purposes.

Table 1: Comparative 95% three-dimensional position/time errors across various receivers.

	SPS			PPS
	Best Location	Median Location	Worst Location	Best Location	Median Location	Worst Location
Handhelp (best 4-SV solution)	16m	32m	72m	10m	30m	71m
Handhelp (AIV solution)	11m	25m	54m	8m	23m	53m
Mobile (land/marine vehicle)	7m	23m	53m	N/A	N/A	N/A
Aviation receiver (AIV, RAIM, tightly coupled with INS)	7m	24m	55m	4m	5m	6m
Survey receiver (dual-frequency, real-time performance)	3m	4m	5m	3m	4m	5m
Aviation receiver dynamic time transfer performance	14ns	45ns	105ns	12ns	13ns	14ns
Time transfer receiver static time transfer performance	10ns	19ns	35ns	10ns	10ns	11ns

Related articles

• GNSS Receivers General Introduction
• Generic Receiver Description